Q&A: What ended the fighting in Gaza – and what are the next steps toward peace?

After nearly two years of war, Israel and Hamas executed a U.S.-brokered ceasefire in Gaza, with President Donald Trump announcing the deal as displaced Palestinian residents began returning to the war-ravaged region of the Middle East.

To better understand the agreement and the chance for peace, UVA Today reached out to foreign affairs expert Stephen D. Mull, the University of Virginia’s vice provost for global affairs and a longtime U.S. Foreign Service officer.

Stephen D. Mull

Stephen D. Mull is the University of Virginia’s vice provost for global affairs and a longtime U.S. Foreign Service officer. (University Communications photo)

Q. The war in Gaza has been going on for two years, with two previous ceasefires lasting only a month or so. What is different this time?

A. Several key factors aligned to make the current ceasefire possible. Fatigue on all sides, a growing international consensus to put pressure on Israel and Hamas to settle, mounting Palestinian anger at Hamas, the recent diminution of Iran’s influence in the region, and rising domestic political pressure on the Netanyahu government certainly all played a role.

The Trump administration deserves significant credit for developing a comprehensive, 20-point peace plan with key regional powers such as Turkey, Egypt and Qatar and winning broad international support for it over the past month. The plan set the stage for the ceasefire by calling for an Israeli commitment not to occupy or annex any part of Gaza or forcibly remove any resident of Gaza who wishes to remain there, and pledging the international community to the redevelopment of the enclave for the exclusive benefit of Gazans.

Q. What are the key points in the ceasefire?

A. Following Hamas’s and Israel’s political agreement on the first steps of the plan last week, the two sides immediately ceased offensive operations, and Israel withdrew its forces behind agreed lines and pledged not to interfere with the repopulation of the territory it had previously occupied.

Hamas then pledged to follow with the release of the 20 remaining living hostages it was still holding, and as many of the remains of the deceased hostages as it could locate, within 72 hours. Once the hostages were released, Israel agreed to free 250 Palestinians who had been serving life sentences for terrorism-related charges; 1,700 Gazans who had been in detention, including all women and children; and the remains of 15 Palestinians in exchange for the remains of each Israeli hostage that Hamas returns.

Simultaneously, Israel agreed to allow resumption of humanitarian aid to Gaza, and supplies were reportedly flowing in again as of Monday. Israel also agreed to provide an amnesty to all Hamas members who commit to peaceful coexistence with Israel and surrender their weapons, and to otherwise permit the safe passage of Hamas members out of Gaza to third countries.

Q. What happens next in the peace process?

A. Israel still occupies about 53% of Gaza since its withdrawal. The Trump administration’s plan envisions further phased Israeli withdrawals, first to 40% and later to 15% of Gaza’s territory, culminating in an Israeli-enforced security perimeter around the enclave until it is no longer deemed a security threat. The pace of subsequent withdrawals will depend on progress on the demilitarization of Gaza, as determined by consultations the United States will facilitate with Israel and the guarantors of the deal, including Turkey, Qatar and Egypt.

Discovery and Innovation: NASA selects UVA researcher for asteroid mission
Discovery and Innovation: NASA selects UVA researcher for asteroid mission

Longer term, the Trump plan envisions the establishment of a “technocratic” government of Palestinian and international experts, under the supervision of a “Board of Peace” that President Trump will chair with the participation of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and other international leaders. Ultimately, the plan commits to reviving the role of a “reformed” Palestinian Authority in governing Gaza, though it is vague about the benchmarks to achieve that goal.

Q. What role will the U.S. or the U.S. military play in post-war Gaza?

A. The U.S. Central Command will assign up to 200 U.S. troops already in the region to create a task force in Israel known as the Civil-Military Coordination Center to work with military representatives from Egypt, Qatar, Turkey and others in the region to monitor the cease-fire remotely and coordinate the delivery of humanitarian aid already underway in Gaza with Israeli authorities.

U.S. military planners will also be responsible for preparing for and supervising the deployment of an Arab-led International Stabilization Force that will assume responsibility for providing security in Gaza as the Israeli Defense Force withdraws from the territory. U.S. policymakers do not foresee any U.S. military participation on the ground within Gaza at this time.

Q. Peace in the Middle East is historically elusive. Are there indications this one could last?

A. There are grounds for cautious optimism, but plenty of questions remain about the durability of the current ceasefire, given the apparent lack of formal agreement by Hamas and Israel to many of the next steps envisioned in the 20-point plan.

For example, while Hamas has reportedly agreed to the plan’s call to renounce any future role in governing Gaza, it has remained silent on whether it will agree to the plan’s insistence on its complete disarmament – something it has previously vowed it would never do. Consultations governing the pace of further Israeli withdrawals from Gaza are certain to be fraught and contentious among all the parties and will require sustained U.S. diplomacy to manage.

On the Israeli side, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s coalition is on shaky ground, with many of his partners to the right deeply skeptical of the plan’s concessions to Hamas. Moreover, the plan does not commit to identifying Palestinian statehood as a goal, risking further inflammation of Palestinian resentment; nor does it address Israel’s continued, and growing, occupation of the West Bank, which remains a tinderbox.

Still, there is a chance that with sustained American attention, a successful Arab-led deployment of the (International Stabilization Force), a renewed prospect for Israeli-Arab rapprochement with an expansion of the Abraham accords, the continued retrenchment of Iran and other opponents of the Middle East peace process, and an enduring international consensus, Gaza will at last recover and rebuild in peace and Israelis will be safe from future Hamas attacks.

Media Contacts

Bryan McKenzie

Assistant Editor, UVA Today Office of University Communications