Study: Disabled, Pregnant Women at Much Greater Risk for Intimate-Partner Violence

Alhusen, an associate professor in UVA’s School of Nursing, says that traditional screening questions for intimate-partner violence don’t go far enough for women with disabilities. (Photo by Dan Addison, University Communications)

Alhusen’s latest study revealed that women with disabilities were 2.5 times more likely to experience violence in the year before and during pregnancy, compared to their non-disabled peers. She also found that one-third of the disabled women reported that their pregnancies were the result of sexual violence. The research – based on the responses from nearly 44,000 women from 24 states who gave birth between 2018 and 2020 – is published in a recent issue of the Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Alhusen, an associate professor in UVA’s School of Nursing, and her co-authors say that traditional screening questions for intimate-partner violence recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists don’t go far enough for women with disabilities.

They suggest more personalized, probing questions such as, “Has your partner prevented you from using a wheelchair, cane, respirator, or other device? Has your partner refused to help you with an important personal need, such as taking your medicine, getting to the bathroom, getting out of bed, bathing, getting dressed, or getting food or drink, or threatened not to help you with these personal needs?”

Regardless of disability status, exposure to violence before, during and after pregnancy can have grave consequences. Alhusen, whose research was among the first to identify the link between exposure to violence during pregnancy and infants’ low birth weight, has, with colleagues, repeatedly affirmed that women who experience violence during pregnancy are more likely to be depressed, experience PTSD and to attempt or commit suicide.

Their children are more likely to be born prematurely, and more likely to suffer from lifelong cognitive problems and physical delays. Their children are also more likely to die at birth.

The study “strongly [suggests] that perinatal intimate-partner violence is a substantial problem for women with disabilities,” Alhusen and her co-authors write, “requiring attention by providers with disability-related knowledge and experience. Given the disparities shown … screening women with disabilities for intimate-partner violence during the perinatal period is an important step toward preventing the occurrence of serious injury, additional disabling health conditions, or death.”

For the woman who endured taunts and later physical violence, when her marriage later ended, she was granted custody of the children. She’s now remarried.

She’s still troubled by the abuse she suffered, and by her willingness, at least for a while, to accept it.

“Part of me feels angry that I should’ve left sooner,” she said. “I was educated. I knew it was all wrong, but I did not want him to have the kids, even part-time, and it scared me to think of what would happen if he did.”