One of the few traits universal to people across the world, regardless of age, gender, race, background, socioeconomic status and culture? Curiosity.
Curiosity is ubiquitous, which is one of the reasons that Jamie Jirout, assistant professor in the University of Virginia’s School of Education and Human Development, decided she wanted to study it.
Now, she will have even more time and resources to do so, after being awarded a 2021 Jacobs Foundation Research Fellowship, one of only four U.S.-based scientists given the prestigious honor (the other nine recipients are international) out of hundreds of applicants.
Based in Switzerland, as its website notes, “the Jacobs Foundation Research Fellowship Program is a globally competitive fellowship program for early and mid-career researchers whose work is dedicated to improving the development, learning, and living conditions of children and youth. The relevant disciplines include, but are not limited to, education sciences, psychology, economics, sociology, family studies, media studies, political science, linguistics, neurosciences, and medical sciences.”
Jamie Jirout is an assistant professor at the UVA School of Education and Human Development. (Contributed photo)
We talked to Jirout about her research and how this fellowship will continue to advance her study of curiosity.
Q. Have you always been curious about … curiosity?
A. Yes. When I was an undergraduate, my senior thesis looked at science education and a science curriculum in Head Start programs. We saw gains not just in science, but across all eight domains that we were studying. And I wondered: Why did science have such a big impact on kids?
I wanted to see if science education promotes curiosity, and I realized there was so little research on curiosity that we didn’t have an effective way to measure if education influences curiosity. So, in graduate school, I focused on, ‘What is curiosity and what does it look like in children?’
Q. And what did you find from that early research?
A. If people are curious, we know there is something they want to know that they don’t currently know, and that when people experience a knowledge gap, sometimes it leads to curiosity – but sometimes it doesn’t. By looking at individual preferences for the amount of uncertainty (knowledge gap), I can start to understand why sometimes people become curious and sometimes they don’t, or how to promote curiosity. I tried to get at individual differences in curiosity by looking at how much uncertainty will lead to exploration in individuals. Some kids are OK with a little uncertainty, some are OK with a lot.
My measure looked at where that peak was and the probability. We had some kids who wanted to explore when there was no uncertainty, i.e. when we would ask them things like, ‘Why did you pick this?’ they’d say, ‘Well, I like to be right and when I know what the answer will be.’ You could see this focus on performance that people had already started to teach these kids and a focus on knowing the answer and being correct. The kids who picked complete uncertainty said that they liked a mystery or a challenge.
Q. Can you share the current focus of your research?
A. I have a grant from the Templeton Foundation to look at curiosity in school settings, and the related basic questions: Is curiosity stable over time, or do we see fluctuations? And how does the school context influence children’s curiosity over time?
Through that work and that grant, we are looking at how often teachers have students asking to generate questions and how much autonomy children have in deciding what they want to learn about. Also, focusing on process over product – for example, when a teacher says, ‘See if you can figure out how to solve this problem’ – where the focus is in the instructional language.
The Templeton grant funds our work in public schools, but public schools aren’t designed to promote curiosity. The things we think will promote curiosity are almost inconsistent with the way our current public school system is structured.

