Q&A: How Did Online Dating Start?

Depending on your age and relationship status, your phone might be littered with dating apps like Hinge, Tinder and Bumble.

You might assume online dating goes back to the 2000s, at the earliest. But you would be wrong; the first forms of “computer dating” emerged in the middle of the 20th century, according to University of Virginia School of Data Science associate professor Mar Hicks.

Meeting that special someone via an algorithm may seem like a novelty, but Hicks says it’s not all that new.

Hicks, an expert on the history of computing and technology, talked to UVA Today about how online dating has changed since its beginnings and what’s remained the same.

Q. How did computer dating start?

A. Computer dating first started in the late 1950s and early 1960s, in a sort of informal way, as people – especially students – started to have access to computers at universities and started playing around with them. 

You see a lot of examples of students experimenting with programming for fun or to play games. Computer dating started as one of these experiments before it was eventually commercialized. At this stage, people were doing a lot of experimenting to see how they might use computers in less conventional ways.

Q. Who first participated in computer dating?

A. Because the earliest examples of computer matchmaking were on university campuses in the U.S. and Europe, it was college students who were the first participants. These college students would use the mainframe to “match up” people for parties as a novel way of breaking the ice. 

When it became clear that there might be a business idea in this, older people who weren’t in college began getting involved in computer matchmaking. In the U.K., with the first example of a computer dating business, the woman who ran it focused on people who were working professionals or even older people like widowers and divorcees. 

At the time, this kind of thing was a little scandalous – not because of the addition of a computer, but because “marriage bureaus” like this were sometimes suspected of being middlemen for pairing up women with men for “dates” in a way that might be more about money and short-term fun than marriage. 

In the U.S., the earliest computer dating business kind of avoided this because it grew out of the college scene and focused on younger, college-adjacent people.

Q. What has remained consistent about online dating?

A. People are still asked to put a lot of faith in matchmaking algorithms. They’re given some choice, but they also are being primed to accept there’s a programmatic decision-making process that is on their side.

Yet, even from quite early in the history of computer dating, we see this isn’t always the case. One relatively early computer dating business in the U.K. that was a bit unscrupulous was accused of adding women into its database who didn’t actually apply, because they needed more women to balance out the pool. 

Another one was shown to have left dangerous, violent men in their pool of potential daters, even though they’d been warned by multiple women who’d been paired up with them, because those men were paying customers. With online dating today, we see similar issues with how profit can get in the way of making it a safe or a positive experience, especially for women who are seeking men.

Q. What has changed about online dating?

A. One thing that’s changed is that the groups who are served by it are so much wider. When it started, the idea was that it was primarily for straight men and women who were ultimately looking to get married to people of the same race and class. 

Nowadays the race and class divisions of early matchmaking are not as rigid, and people who are queer are not only allowed on the main dating sites, but there are also all types of apps devoted specifically to the LGBTQ community. There are also apps and platforms that are for people who are not interested in meeting someone for the purpose of getting married, and that no longer has the same kind of social opprobrium attached to it.

Q. Many nervous dating app users follow a download-delete-redownload cycle. Did computer daters do something similar in the past?

A. I think this was less of a pattern in the past, simply because the people who were using these services in the past did not have the same level of convenient access to starting and stopping the service, and also the services cost relatively more. 

‘Inside UVA’ A Podcast Hosted by Jim Ryan
‘Inside UVA’ A Podcast Hosted by Jim Ryan

They had to go out in person with the people they got matched up with instead of having a long runway to get to know them online. In the past, if computer dating didn’t work out for someone, they were generally less likely to want to keep trying it. Now, it’s such a ubiquitous way of meeting people that I think folks feel like they have few other good options, and so they return to online dating apps even when they feel like they may be going back to a dry well.

Q. Dating app downloads are trending down, and anecdotally, a lot of people seem fed up with them. Did early online dating face a similar drop-off in users?

A. Early computer dating, before it was online dating, had a heyday. There was a sweet spot when social norms had changed enough in the late ’60s, then into the ’70s and ’80s, that these businesses were growing. But as new technologies came in – things like video dating – and the novelty of getting matched up by computer wore off a bit, people moved to other novel methods of meeting each other. 

The internet changed everything. By the late 1990s through early 2000s, the convenience of being able to use your own computer to meet people, whether that was through a chat group or online personals, was setting people up for a new golden age in computer matchmaking. 

The online dating platforms and apps that came into existence in the 21st century all took advantage of the fact that people were hungry for a way to meet each other that took some of the fear of meeting new people, and the responsibility for making new connections, out of their hands. By shifting the responsibility to a computer, or an algorithm, but leaving more room for customer choice, it changed the equation and made people feel – for a brief time – that they might have much better outcomes dating online. 

As it became clear that that probably wasn’t true, I think a lot of people became disillusioned with online dating, even though a lot of people did also have good experiences.

Media Contact

Alice Berry

University News Associate Office of University Communications