This conversation with Kevin Jerome Everson combines two Skype interviews. The first one took place on January 17, 2013, as Kevin headed to Sundance. Our second conversation took place on May 3, 2013, and we spoke from our respective campus offices at Yale University and the University of Virginia, where Kevin is an art professor.
There are more than 300 theories surrounding the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. “Only few have hard evidence attached, and only one has sufficient evidence so we can say with great confidence that someone did it — that someone being Lee Harvey Oswald,” said Larry Sabato, head of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia and author of the new best-seller “The Kennedy Half-Century.”
What should not have been a surprise to any American in 1963 is how easy it was to kill a president. Kennedy, like presidents before him, often rode through downtown city streets in an open limousine, an easy target for a sniper. “This was a disaster waiting to happen, and just about everyone in authority at the time knew it,” Larry Sabato, a professor of political science at the University of Virginia, writes in his new book, “The Kennedy Half-Century.”
(By Dr. Christian Chisholm of the UVa Division of Maternal/Fetal Medicine; Dr. James E. Ferguson, chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology; and Sharon Veith, a registered nurse with UVa Division of Neonatology’s perinatal outreach) November is Prematurity Awareness Month, bringing attention to the significant problem of premature birth, which costs society more than $26 billion a year and takes a high toll on families.
In a way, President John F. Kennedy has haunted the nation for a half century, a new history of his assassination and its aftermath written by a Virginia scholar suggests. University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato, remembering how he and his fellow students at a Norfolk Catholic school grasped their rosaries when they heard the news that the president had been shot, argues in his new book that Kennedy's death changed the way we think about presidents, while the aftermath undermined our confidence in authority.
“The Kennedy assassination was an enormous shock to the system, a disillusioning event. We had fooled ourselves into believing that it couldn’t happen here, when our history was actually full of violent attacks against leaders,” said Larry J. Sabato, director of the University of Virginia’s Center for Politics.
University of Virginia professor Larry Sabato concludes in “The Kennedy Half-Century” after extensive research that the “evidence” of a fourth shot – and therefore a second gunman – instead of the three shots witnesses heard was wrong. Studies of recordings from an open microphone on a Dallas police officer’s motorcycle don’t include the sound of any shots, said Sabato, because it was too far away.
In the 50 years since the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, it has become a cliché to call it the first fully televised tragedy. But it’s hard for us to grasp how the continuous coverage impacted a generation that had never before received this kind of news in this kind of way. “The relative newness of the television phenomenon required Americans to grapple with the uncanniness, as well as the anguish, of what they were going through,” writes Aniko Bodroghkozy of the University of Virginia’s Media Studies Department. “Americans constructed a very particu...
Spending the summer guarding one of the NBA's best players has the Melbourne Tigers expecting big things from new import Mustapha Farrakhan.
If the folkloric character of Robin Hood actually existed, he’d be hard-pressed to find any place better to ply his trade than Greenwich, Conn., perhaps the wealthiest town in the world. It happens to be the home of the Tudor Investment Corp., a $13 billion hedge fund run by the energetic 59-year-old Paul Tudor Jones II.
Since the tragic day of November 22, 1963, two US presidents have been highly effective in using the memory of JFK to their own ends, according to University of Virginia political scientist Larry Sabato, author of “The Kennedy Half-Century: The Presidency, Assassination and Lasting Legacy of John F. Kennedy.”
Jacqueline Kennedy was, says University of Virginia historian and Kennedy biographer Barbara Perry, as stark a contrast to Mamie Eisenhower as one could imagine: "She was only 31 when she and President Kennedy came into office. She had these two beguiling children; Caroline was only three when they came into the White House. John Jr. had just been born. She was the third youngest first lady ever to appear at the White House. She was so stunningly beautiful and had such amazing clothing. The way she spoke was different, in her breathy voice. Everything about her seemed different."
The young woman's voice was so quiet that Stephanie Nakasian had trouble hearing it. "I really want to sing," the woman told Nakasian in a whispery voice. "I love music. My mother is a piano teacher, and she has the most beautiful voice. She is a singer, but I'm not." Nakasian, an accomplished jazz singer and voice teacher at the University of Virginia and the College of William and Mary, has heard countless people say they weren't singers. More than 30 years of experience have convinced her that, in almost every case, that's just not true.
"There's certainly room for adjustment, but not anything sweeping," says David A. Martin, a law professor at the University of Virginia and the principal deputy general counsel of the Department of Homeland Security in 2009 and 2010. "The justifications for DACA made clear that this is not a situation where the president can reduce overall enforcement of immigration laws. He can just redirect it in certain ways."
Investigative documents from Smith's case, reviewed by The Baltimore Sun, show how a few missteps and wrong turns can lead to an unjust outcome: Detectives following one lead fail to account for another. Witnesses lie in court. Prosecutors sell jurors on a bad case. "When you study these exonerations, it's really humbling to see how many ways people err," said Brandon L. Garrett, a University of Virginia law professor who studies wrongful convictions.
You will be hearing a lot about the assassination of President Kennedy as we approach the 50th anniversary next week. But CBS News has something you haven't heard before: the University of Virginia has given CBS access to newly enhanced Dallas police recordings that tell the story of that day, from beginning to end.
East meets west in Charlottesville this week. A group of Tibetan doctors is working with the University of Virginia and other groups to integrate their special type of medicine into classes here and create a center for Tibetan medicine.
Larry Sabato, a professor of politics at the University of Virginia, said Rubio was appealing to the Republican base. “The Republican electorate hasn’t changed one iota. They are just as conservative as ever. Rubio has been seen as moderate on immigration so he has to be seen as conservative in other areas,” he said.
In early 2012, electronic-pop duo Gems (singer Lindsay Pitts and guitarist Clifford Usher, both U.Va. grads) took a handful of home-recorded songs and posted them to the online music repository Soundcloud. Months passed. Over time, Gems periodically posted a new single here, another there, accompanied by a new promo photo—often a shadowy image of Pitts, pouting in black and white. Last week, Gems' total Soundcloud listens broke 400,000.
Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, cites several factors that might weigh in Cuccinelli’s favor were he to decide to make a run at Warner: President Obama’s declining poll numbers, how Obamacare ultimately plays out and the fact that there are not yet any candidates “who could even vaguely” make a competitive run. Even so, Sabato shares Rozell’s skepticism. “Nobody's unbeatable, but Mark Warner would be a very tough target, especially for Ken Cuccinelli, (and) I don't know where Cuccinelli would get the c...